RE: [nc-whois] Voiding bulk access rights?

["Timothy Denton" <tim@tmdenton.com>]

They all use throw-away corporations for this purpose.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-whois@dnso.org]On Behalf
Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:02 PM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org; Rick Wesson; Ross Wm. Rader
Subject: [nc-whois] Voiding bulk access rights?


One issue which came up during today's conference call with the  
registrars was the concern that bulk data users who break the bulk  
access agreement's provisions are still entitled to enter into a 
_new_ agreement with the same registrar.

A reasonable remedy for this may be to add a clause to the bulk  
access policy which voids any eligibility for receiving bulk access  
upon breaking the agreement, so it's no longer "10,000$ per spam".

On the other hand, there's nothing which would prevent infringers  
 from using throwaway corporations for this kind of activity.  What  
do you folks think?

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>