RE: [nc-whois] Revised Bulk Access Draft

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Note from the co-chair: 

I'll be doing some extensive drafting this week end, myself, I hope. Assuming all goes well.
There are other sections which have to be drafted, and we need to focus in on the documentation. Some of the TF members could volunteer to do more in some of those areas.

Rembmer, too, that you need to be able to provide an input from your constituency -- will you have a constiutency report?

Bret/Troy, can you get in touch with me regarding the BC? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Elizaga [mailto:karen@elizaga.name]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:40 AM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Cc: Francis Coleman; fcoleman@rochester.rr.com
Subject: [nc-whois] Revised Bulk Access Draft


Thanks, everyone, for your comments.  Again, I have tried to incorporate all comments as best I could.

In response to some of the comments made yesterday, I just wanted to respond as follows:

1.	Re: Kristy's opt-in concern:  I agree that the survey results showed that opt-in was largely supported by the respondents, and it would be my preference to incorporate such a structure into our recommendation.  However, a point was made early on that opt-out was probably overlooked as a feasible structure as a result of visceral and adverse reactions to marketing where NEITHER opt out or opt in have been made available.  The interim report, as published, contains this language and therefore has been carried through in this draft - see 3.3.6.3 discussion (the new bullet point simply makes the same point for further recommendations).  If we want to change our recommendation to advocate opt-in, then we should discuss.

2.	Re:  Steve's comment on 3.3.6.5:  I modified the section to make recommendations in 2 scenarios:  (1) if value-added products/services are deemed to be solely related to marketing, and (2) if they encompass other research services as he has suggested.  Does it make sense?  Steve, as you surmised, I was not suggesting that we get rid of services such as those you highlighted; it was simply my interpretation of this provision as solely related to marketing.

3.	Re:  Thomas's addition of registrars to those who should be consulted with, I did not include the comment in the first bullet point since they are included in a bullet point that follows below.

4.	Re:  Abel's comment regarding support for VeriSign (last substantive paragraph of his email), i did not understand it.  Abel, can you clarify?

Thanks again.

Regards.
KE

 <<WG 4 Revised 221102.doc>> 

Karen Elizaga
Vice President - Policy
Global Name Registry
125 High Holborn
London WC1V 6QA UK
Tel:  +44 (0)20 7025-2231
Mob:  +44 (0)7740 871-698
Fax:  +44 (0)20 7242-9105
Email:  karen@elizaga.name  
Web:  www.name



Information contained herein is Global Name Registry Proprietary Information and is made available to you because of your interest in our company.    This information is submitted in confidence and its disclosure to you is not intended to constitute public disclosure or authorization for disclosure to other parties.
*****************
What's your .name?
Get one at www.name
*****************