RE: [nc-whois] Wesson on Whois Policy.

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Thomas, et al

I think we have all agreed that privacy and access are issues which are work to be done... Can you also talk on Mnodayy about the "issues section", which would include further work recommended by the TF, and how to do that work? Meaning: what are we recommending?



-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 2:12 AM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] Wesson on Whois Policy.


http://www.circleid.com/articles/2552.asp

Is Whois Data Accuracy Enough?

The Whois Task Force of the Domain Name Supporting Organization
(DNSO) has been consulting with registrars over the past few months
on the Whois accuracy issue for law enforcement. The Task Force has
enumerated three primary areas of interest: accuracy, uniformity,
and better searching capabilities. When the registrars met with the
Task Force in Shanghai, a fourth area of interest was also brought
forward and advocated by many of the registrars at the meeting as
paramount to the other three areas. This fourth area of interest was
privacy.

[...]

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>