ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [nc-whois] Final (?): Accuracy


Abel's comment was the impetus for the discussion about how the 15 day
period is applicable to registrars, not to ICANN, and that there was
considerable uncertainty in some quarters about how registrars would define
the category of "cases not clearly fraudulent."  So I do not believe there
was consensus to include this in the report.  Of course it could be included
as an individual view.   

In the spirit that even the best things must come to an end, let me offer my
view that the time to make changes in these two sections of the final report
before they are posted is at an end.  Collectively, we have devoted
thousands of hours to this process, culminating in our line-by-line review
in a 2.5-hour conference call today, and it would not be fair to see the
final outcome determined by who happens to be awake or online the instant
before the posting is made.  Of course, there will be further opportunities
for comment between the time the final report is posted and the time the
Names Council acts upon it.  But for now let's focus on getting the report,
as we have finalized it, posted, and on providing whatever assistance we can
to those TF members who have undertaken to do this.  

Steve Metalitz   

-----Original Message-----
From: Abel Wisman
To: 'Thomas Roessler'; nc-whois@dnso.org
Sent: 11/27/2002 7:34 PM
Subject: RE: [nc-whois] Final (?): Accuracy

I believe there was a consensus or at least a no objection to adding to
1C (?) an advise to ICANN to implement the 15 day period with leniency
in cases not clearly fraudulent and outside of the USA considering
time-frames of postal deliveries to such areas.

I would appreciate it if this was added.

Kind regards

Abel


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-whois@dnso.org] On Behalf
Of Thomas Roessler
Sent: 27 November 2002 22:05
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] Final (?): Accuracy


Here's the accuracy chapter in HTML, including a variety of links. I
have taken the liberty to add a little headline to IC.

-- 
Thomas Roessler                        <roessler@does-not-exist.org>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>