[nc-whois] Some feedback from gTLD members

["Ram Mohan" <rmohan@afilias.info>]

Team:
Here is the first set of feedback from gTLD members regarding Whois TF work
product.

Please call me or write me for clarifications.
Thanks,
Ram


> My concerns remain the same as already communicated regarding I.A.3
(posting
> Whois contact info), I.B.2 (15 day response limit), I.B.3 (15 day response
> limit), III.A (cost and feasibility of validation), III.b.3
(enforceability
> may be unrealistic).  (BTW, the numbering/lettering of the motion is
really
> strange and hard to follow.)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ram Mohan [mailto:rmohan@AFILIAS.INFO]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 6:39 PM
> To: GTLD-PLANNING@nic.museum
> Subject: [GTLD-RC] Fw: [nc-whois] DRAFT resolution v. 2.1a
>
>
> Do you have any comments on this resolution that's being proposed in the
> Whois TF as a resolution to be placed in front of the NC?
>
> -ram
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Metalitz" <metalitz@iipa.com>
> To: <nc-whois@dnso.org>
> Cc: <fcoleman@gnr.com>; <agrawal@epic.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:11 AM
> Subject: [nc-whois] DRAFT resolution v. 2.1a
>
>
> > Per Marilyn's suggestion that we move this issue ot the list, I attach
> > version 2.1 of the draft resolution, with the relevant excerpts from the
> > Final Report pasted in in italics.  I hope this will give a clearer
> picture
> > of the proposed resolution, which the IPC Names Council representatives
> > support.
> >
> > Steve Metalitz
> >
> >  <<Domain Names Whois TF DRAFT 2.1a Council resolution sjm 121102.doc>>
> >
>