The
official status is the report was received, or accepted by the NC. The comment
site will be reopened. I had asked Glen to wait until I talked to Bruce Tonkin
to be sure we were in agreement on the time frame. He hasn't been able to
respond to me, so, it will be reopened probably tomorrow, and stay open until
January 30, which is the date which the Implementation Working Group has to
close it's work, as well. We will then take the additional comments, and
put forward another version of the policy recommendations and other
recommendations for vote by the NC at the 2/20 meeting. That is what would
then be forwarded to the Board.
Separately, we will also present the two issues reports at the end of
January from both Kristy's and Ram's groups. These will also be presented to
the NC on 2/20.
We
are also asked to plan to close this TF. Provide a recommended new TOR to the
NC for consideration for establishing a new TF. It was acknowledged that there
is likely to be overlap in membership, but that is up to the constituencies to
decide. There is the possibility of participation in that TF by the At
Large.
This
is taken from my notes and is what I have been trying to reach Bruce to verify
before posting. He has been traveling. I'll talk to Glen further to verify
that my notes are accurate in summarizing the outcome. Others on the call are
welcome to comment on this as well.
We
would plan a TF call the first week of January in any case. By then, Bruce
will have been able to comment; Glen and I will have been able to consult
using her minutes/my notes and any other input from the TF.
Marilyn
Marilyn
What is the
official status of our recommendations from the Amsterdam
meeting?
Thanks,
Ruchika
At 02:21 PM 12/19/2002
+0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
From what I understood in
Amsterdam, we are supposed to accept more
public comments in the coming
days and weeks, i.e., the public
comment site should be
re-opened.
Am I mistaken?
Regards,
--
Thomas
Roessler (mobile) <roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net>