<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-whois] Re: whois: some questions...
thanks. That was my understanding.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler@does-not-exist.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:11 PM
To: Louis Touton
Cc: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [nc-whois] Re: whois: some questions...
On 2003-02-05 12:56:53 -0800, Louis Touton wrote:
> Thomas--I'm not sure what language from Steve you are talking
> about. But I don't see any grounds at this point for treating the
> EC submission as the submission of a single department. It was
> prepared by the Internal Market DG in cooperation with
> Information Society DG, and it explicitly states: "The European
> Commission has read the reports of the ICANN Whois Task Force
> with great interest and would like to comment . . . ." On its
> face, it is not restricted to a particular unit.
Thanks, that clarifies things. I'll do a couple of final cosmetic
changes, and then post another draft.
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|