<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [nc-whois] Tucows Comments on the WHOIS TF Final Report
- To: "Ram Mohan" <rmohan@afilias.info>, "NC-WHOIS (E-mail)" <nc-whois@dnso.org>
- Subject: RE: [nc-whois] Tucows Comments on the WHOIS TF Final Report
- From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@att.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2003 08:33:58 -0500
- Sender: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org
- Thread-Index: AcLbzZmDwAKz1AFiSkajrlhk9alkIwAOx4Vw
- Thread-Topic: [nc-whois] Tucows Comments on the Whois TF Final Report
One
thing that concerns me also is that it is "easy" but also unfair to characterize
all concerns about keeping WHOIS available as driven by trademark, patent, and
copyright lobbies. Consumers use WHOIS to see who is behind a web site their
child visits, businesses check out suppliers, etc. Privacy issues for a
business, or an organization, or someone who is conducting commerce on the
Internet may be very different than someone who is indeed an
individual. As a Task Force, let's keep an
open
mind as we examine the issues related to privacy and WHOIS, and try to stay
focused on our task of looking at the range of questions.
I just ran into this
and walked away surprised that the entire report would be desupported due to
one component that was clearly planned to be addressed.
-ram
Tucows Comments on the Whois TF Final ReportPosted by ross at February 17, 2003 12:07 PM
To get completely to the point, we don't support the report because it
misses its mark.
The brief summary is:
- We reject the report because it decouples the primary issue of privacy
from the secondary issues and therefore unduly benefits the trademark,
copyright and patent lobbies. - there are some portions of the report that
we support. - there are some portions of the report that we don't
support - All of these portions must be dealt with in the context of
privacy and regard for the customer, not the lawyers.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|