<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [nc-whois] time change on WHOIS Call to only 30 minutes/beginning at 1:30 p.m. EST/same bridge information which Glen distributed...
I also posted the Section on Privacy, Free Speech and Anonymity (see
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/nc-whois/Arc00/msg01008.html)....
Thanks,
Ruchika
At 09:23 PM 3/13/2003 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
>On 2003-03-13 12:35:38 -0500, Marilyn Cade wrote:
>
> > Based on the contributions I have received to date, and other
> > pressures of all, including the need to finish any outstanding
> > commitment/contributions, Tony and I are changing the time of the
> > call to 1:30 p.m. EST and it will last only 30 minutes.
>
>What kinds of contributions do you have so far, besides the ones
>which made it to the list? I could try to merge things tomorrow
>morning my time (i.e., well before the call) when I'll have a
>relatively long train ride.
>
>Things I have so far include:
>
>- My own draft.
>- Ruchika's texts on the FTC recommendations about avoiding
> publication of data, and on the OECD principles.
>
>The more I think about it, the more I end up agreeing that the
>national law side can be handled relatively briefly in the issues
>report, by basically stating something along these lines of this:
>
> In various countries (including, in particular, the EU),
> privacy and data protection laws may apply to registrars'
> WHOIS services and registrars' participation in thick
> registry WHOIS services. The Task Force is not in a
> position to give a thorough legal analysis of these aspects,
> and proposes that the GAC or other relevant multinational
> bodies be consulted about approaches for designing WHOIS
> policies in a way which is compatible with any such laws.
>
>What else is missing? As I said above, I'll have an opportunity to
>draft somethings early tomorrow, i.e., well before our call.
>
>Greetings from the way back home from CeBIT,
>--
>Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|