RE: [nc-whois] latest draft

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@att.com>]

e Folks, as I read this,  we aren't meeting the objective of providing additional information
to the Council in an manner which is consistent with the broad views of the Task Force.  It is coming
across without easily understood messages which will be helpful to inform the Council of the work which we have compiled.
I had expected that we would almost have a bibioligography of the past publications, and the recent contriubtions.

We need to think about this very carefully. Our goal is to augment the Issues Report. We aren't there at this point.
My fault for not drafting as much as I intended. 

Thanks for organizing this as you did Thomas, to put things received to date into one place. 

This makes it clear to me that this needs to probably turn into more of a transmittal of contriubtions, earlier presentations which are relevant, facts and materials, links, etc.
Let's have a very short call at 1:30 p.m.

Thomas, I'll take the stuff from the Issues Paper and refine it for the "Next Steps"/I think it should be "Possible Next Steps to Consider"....

Marilyn and Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Roessler [mailto:roessler-mobile@does-not-exist.net]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 6:41 AM
To: nc-whois@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-whois] latest draft


Please find attached the latest draft state.  This is the result of
some extensive cutting, pasting, and re-formatting.  I almost
certainly have missed some things which were submitted for inclusion
with the report...

Given the current time limitations, it doesn't seem too realistic to
prepare a full background chapter before Rio; we may have to leave
some of this out.

Regards,
-- 
Thomas Roessler				<roessler@does-not-exist.org>