Re: [nc-whois] HOW TO PROCEED

[Ken Stubbs <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

i am ok with that also...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@att.com>
To: "NC-WHOIS (E-mail)" <nc-whois@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: [nc-whois] HOW TO PROCEED


> I spent some time this week end trying to sort out what we can actually
say in addition to the Issues Report.
>
> My conclusion after reviewing inputs, and different perspectives of TF
members is that we can't say a whole
> lot more, other than gathering the materials contributed and noting that
some members of the Task Force made
> specific contributions.
>
> Here's the recommended approach.
>
> Tony and I will redraft the Introduction to simply explain what this is,
using Thomas' input and circulate it.
> Second section will be the Issues Report which was posted last week,
without any change.
> the third section will capture the "Need for Further Consultation" from
the Issues Report.
> The fourth section will [largely be what Thomas posted] but with an effort
to fully reflect the broad and different views of the TF itself; it will
include the list of contributions which have been received as documents, and
a listing of the various viewpoints with an introductory statement which
says that
> these were received by the Task Force as individual contributions from
members and other parties, but
> that the Task Force did not develop any kind of agreement on the different
perspectives. Like the initial survey results which should be included, they
are presented
> as concepts that may be useful in "next steps".
>
> It will be as balanced and inclusive of all views as possible and make
every attempt not to present advocacy of one perspective or another.
>
> We'll review it tomorrow. IF we can't agree, then we will simply let the
Issues Report stand as it is and make a short statement but without the
document concluded by RIO.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 202-255-7348c
> mcade@att.com
>
>
>