DNSO Archives: [nc-whois]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[nc-whois]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

[nc-whois] request by the co-chairs of NC-WHOIS TF to correct the Council agenda

To: "Bruce Tonkin (E-mail)" <bruce.tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>, "DNSO Secretariat (E-mail)" <DNSO.Secretariat@dnso.org>
Subject: [nc-whois] request by the co-chairs of NC-WHOIS TF to correct the Council agenda
From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP" <mcade@att.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 21:23:38 -0500
Cc: "Louis Touton (E-mail)" <touton@icann.org>, "NC-WHOIS (E-mail)" <nc-whois@dnso.org>
Sender: owner-nc-whois@dnso.org
Thread-Index: AcLtvoxhz1ju/urvSZ6N9uwL1Mxtog==
Thread-Topic: request by the co-chairs of NC-WHOIS TF to correct the Council agenda


Dear Bruce

In reviewing the agenda for the Council there seems to be an inaccuracy. The Issues report on accuracy and on privacy submitted by the TF are shown 
as discussing items, while the Issues Report from the Non-Commercial Constituency is shown for action. All Issues Reports should have similar treatment. Can we ask that you correct the agenda, please, and post a corrected version. 

As we recall, the Council's response to Issues reports is guided by the new PDP process.  We would appreciate a verification that this change has been made, and clarification of the agenda provided.

best regards,



Marilyn S. Cade		 Antonio Harris

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>