<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] [Fwd: [council] Input on At Large study]
Fellow Registrars
First may I wish all a prosperous 2001 and a happy holiday period.....
Just before the vacation we have been asked to submit comments on the At
large....
Please submit any comments either directly to ICANN or to either Ken, Erica or
myself and we will compile a response for the following....
Whether the ICANN Board should include "At Large" Directors;
If so, how many such Directors there should be;
How any such "At Large" Directors should be selected, including
consideration of
at least the following options: selection by an "At Large"
membership;
appointment by the existing Board; selection or appointment by some
other entity
or entities; and any combination of those options;
If selection by an "At Large" membership is to be used, the
processes and
procedures by which that selection will take place; and
What the appropriate structure, role and functions of an "At Large"
membership
should be.
The Board shall establish, by the Annual Meeting in 2000, a process
and structure
for the study that will enable it to meet the following deadlines:
a. The results of the study should be presented to the Board no
later than the
second quarterly meeting of the Corporation in 2001;
b. The Board shall review the study, and propose for public comment
whatever
actions it deems appropriate as a result of the study, on a
schedule that would
permit the Board to take final action on the study no later than
the Annual Meeting
of the Corporation in 2001; and
c. Any actions taken by the Board as a result of the study that
require the selection
of any "At Large" Directors should be implemented on a schedule
that will allow
any new "At Large" Directors to be seated no later than the
conclusion of the
Annual Meeting of the Corporation in 2002."
Andrew McLaughlin wrote:
> NC members:
>
> This is a reminder that we're looking for input on the structure, etc., of
> the upcoming At Large study
> <http://www.icann.org/at-large/study-comments.htm>. In particular, it would
> be very helpful if you (either individually, or otherwise) could send us
> your suggestions for possible members of the At Large study committee. As
> always, we are looking for diversity among the various stakeholder
> communities, and by geography.
>
> If you would prefer not to post committee membership suggestions on the
> public comment forum, feel free to send them directly to us via email. The
> posted deadline for input is December 27 -- so the sooner, the better.
>
> Best regards,
>
> --Andrew
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> andrew mclaughlin | chief policy officer
> internet corporation for assigned names and numbers
> <ajm@icann.org> | <http://www.icann.org>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|