Fw: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]

[dwascher@iaregistry.com]

I will be on the plane but will have someone sit in for me.

David Wascher
Manager IARegistry
dwascher@iaregistry.com
803.802.6553
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ivan Vachovsky" <ivan@abac.com>
To: <jtai@dotster.com>; "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>; "Paul M
Kane" <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>; "Registrars List" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 3:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]


> Me too.
> ----------------------------------
> Ivan Vachovsky,
> President
> ABACUS America Inc. d.b.a. A+Net
> Ste 880, 4660 La Jolla Village Dr.
> San Diego, CA, 92122
> (858) 558-8522  x 103
>
> www.aplus.net   Internet Services
> www.websolo.com   Affordable web hosting
> www.names4ever.com  Accredited Domain Registrar
> www.paybutton.com   Billing for e-commerce
> www.server4me.com  Server co-location
> www.fiberia.com   Free e-mail and web services
> www.rodopi.com   Billing software for IP services
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Tai (Dotster Inc)" <jtai@dotster.com>
> To: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>; "Paul M. Kane"
> <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>; "Registrars List" <registrars@dnso.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:21 PM
> Subject: RE: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]
>
>
> > I am in favor of such call as suggested
> >
> >
> > JT
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Elana Broitman
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:02 PM
> > To: Paul M. Kane; Registrars List
> > Subject: Re: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]
> >
> >
> > I am available to join such a call.  I would second one as soon as
> possible,
> > since many in the U.S. may be leaving for Australia soon.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Paul M. Kane <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>
> > To: Registrars List <registrars@dnso.org>
> > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 7:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Fwd: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement]
> >
> >
> > > In light of the substantive change of direction of the proposed
> ICANN/NSI
> > agreement and the relatively few Registrars who will be in Melbourne
would
> > it be an idea to
> > > hold a tel conf
> > >
> > > May I invite your comments, both supporting comments and opposing
> commnets
> > must be substantive and may I draw your attention to section "D" of
> > > http://www.icann.org/melbourne/proposed-verisign-agreements-topic.htm
> > >
> > > The NC will be discussing this issue on Sunday....
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [registrars] proposed ICANN/Verisign Agreement
> > > > Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 10:49:04 -0500
> > > > From: Larry Erlich <erlich@domainregistry.com>
> > > > Organization: DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
> > > > To: Erica Roberts <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
> > > > CC: registrars@dnso.org
> > > > References: <022201c0a538$a9e3bcc0$8dd4fea9@pcax10series>
> > > >
> > > > We are 100% against this, and we are planning
> > > > to do whatever is necessary to prevent
> > > > this from happening.
> > > >
> > > > We will be filing a formal objection
> > > > which we will try and post to the list.
> > > >
> > > > Erica, below you said:
> > > >
> > > > "Since there has been no objection from the Registrars, it has been
> > > > claimed that the draft agreement is supported by the Registrars."
> > > >
> > > > Who exactly has made this claim?
> > > >
> > > > Larry Erlich
> > > >
> > > > http://www.DomainRegistry.com
> > > >
> > > > Erica Roberts wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The proposed new ICANN/Verising Agreement is likely to be
discussed
> in
> > many fora at the ICANN Melbourne meeting including the Names Council -
see
> > > > >
> http://www.icann.org/melbourne/proposed-verisign-agreements-topic.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > Since there has been no objection from the Registrars, it has been
> > claimed that the draft agreement is supported by the Registrars.
However,
> > to my knowledge t
> > > > > Since this will impact most on Registrars, it would be useful if
> this
> > matter could be included in the agenda for discussion in Melb.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > erica
> > > > >
> > > >
  ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > The proposed new ICANN/Verising Agreement is likely to be
discussed
> in
> > > > > many fora at the ICANN Melbourne meeting including the Names
> Council -
> > > > > see
> > > > >
> http://www.icann.org/melbourne/proposed-verisign-agreements-topic.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > Since there has been no objection from the Registrars, it has been
> > > > > claimed that the draft agreement is supported by the Registrars.
> > > > > However, to my knowledge the Registrars Consistuency have not
> > > > > established any position on this matter.  In order to ensure that
> the
> > > > > Registrars constituency is appropriately represented in the
matter,
> I
> > > > > would appreciate Registrar comments on the proposal.
> > > > > Since this will impact most on Registrars, it would be useful if
> this
> > > > > matter could be included in the agenda for discussion in Melb.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > erica
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
> > > > 215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich@DomainRegistry.com
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>