ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[registrars] [Fwd: [council] Verisign ICANN agreement - DNSO input]]


> Further to the ICANN Board's request for DNSO input on the substantive
> issues of the proposed revision to the Verisign ICANN agreement the
> following timetable will apply:
>
> 1. Constituency and GA input
> All constituencies and the GA are requested to discuss the issues and send a
> short report via their NC reps to the council list latest 12 noon (your
> local time) SUNDAY 25 MARCH 2001.
>
> Please keep reports short, listed in note form and focused on the
> desirability of the status quo (old agreement) and the new agreement. What
> are the pros and cons ? Which agreement do you prefer?
>
> (If you are able to cooperate with other constituencies and make a joint
> position - even better.)
>
> 2. DNSO and NC consolidation
> I will then review these reports for common ground and produce a proposed
> DNSO statement. It will have an umbrella DNSO statement where there is
> common ground and list the Constituency positions thereafter.
>
> There will be a special NC teleconference at 15:00 Paris time Wednesday 28
> March at which the NC and GA chair will agree to a statement based on the
> consolidated document.
>
> That statement will be forwarded to the ICANN Board to meet their deadline
> of 31 March 2001.
>
> Philip Sheppard
> NC Chair

Please see above and send comments as soon as possible.

Thanks

Paul



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>