Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign

["Paul M. Kane" <Paul.Kane@REACTO.com>]

I agree with Ross .. time is against us. If someone can being me up to speed, I
will see if  the NC can discuss this issue at the next call (11th April). There
is also the Registrars Conf Call tomorrow.  I had thought anti-warehousing was
already included. Amadeu, could you send me a copy of your original proposal...
thanks

Best

Paul

"Ross Wm. Rader" wrote:

> I fear the time may have past, but the effort is still certainly worthwhile.
> I would support an effort to revive Amadeu's earlier work to be presented to
> the NC for ratification as a consensus policy.
>
> -rwr
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Amadeu Abril i Abril
> > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 7:28 PM
> > To: Robert F. Connelly
> > Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
> > Verisign
> >
> >
> > "Robert F. Connelly" wrote:
> > >
> > > At 09:52 AM 4/2/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > >
> > > >There are no ICANN policies concerning warehousing.
> > >
> >
> > Well, my very last task as NC rep was to start a resolution on
> > concrete language to implement the anti-warehousing language provided
> > for in the ICANN Accreditation Agreement... but was then "sent" to the
> > Board and I am afraid that NC never pursued that work.....
> >
> > Hope something could be done here ;-))
> >
> > Amadeu