Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign

[Larry Erlich <erlich@domainregistry.com>]

Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> 
> Mr. Foot. I'd like you to meet Mr. Mouth. Mr. Mouth, meet Mr. Foot.
> 
> I have a bad habit of reaming off emails that no one is supposed to see.
> They are usually inflammatory, ill-conceived, chauvinistic, wrong, racist,
> poorly-spelled,  sadistic, contemptuous, ornery, spastic, foolish, mean,
> shortsighted, clouded, inept, addled, apish, inapprehensible, wookian,
> conceited, stupid and in addition to the foregoing, just downright wrong.
> 
> And they usually get sent to the trashbin,

I've never had a Canadian customer that I didn't
like. Exceedingly nice people. 
(This explains it now. Must be good self control.)

> with the exception of the odd one
> that makes it to the list every five years ago.

> 
> For only $9.95 a month, you can subscribe to all of the messages I don't
> send. The earlier one was a free sample. ;)

"Subscribe" I will send a check. Canadians are also good comedians.

Larry Erlich

http://www.DomainRegistry.com



> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Erica Roberts [mailto:erica.roberts@bigpond.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:20 PM
> > To: ross@tucows.com; Elana Broitman; Amadeu Abril i Abril; Robert F.
> > Connelly
> > Cc: registrars@dnso.org; Rob Hall
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
> > Verisign
> >
> >
> > I think you are right Ross, but as I recall it, his whole thread
> > came up in
> > response to a discussion about anti-warehousing provisions and their
> > enforcement.  If we are talking about enforcement, we need a
> > consensus-based
> > policy endorsed by the NC.
> >
> > erica
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
> > To: "Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; "Elana Broitman"
> > <ebroitman@register.com>; "Amadeu Abril i Abril" <Amadeu@nominalia.com>;
> > "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>; "Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.ca>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 3:28 AM
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN - Verisign
> >
> >
> > > I don't recall that this was going to be put forward on that
> > basis. To the
> > > contrary, I explicitly remember a constituency vote that called for the
> > > document to be put forward as a voluntary best practices statement, not
> > > binding policy adopted through the NC route. Maybe I'm reading your
> > message
> > > wrong as it is conceivably possible to put forward a resolution
> > that would
> > > state the the document is a voluntary statement of practice...
> > >
> > > Clarification anyone?
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > > > Behalf Of Erica Roberts
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 10:12 AM
> > > > To: Elana Broitman; Amadeu Abril i Abril; Robert F. Connelly
> > > > Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
> > > > Verisign
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I underrstand that the process for getting a 'best practices' document
> > > > enshrined in ICANN 'policy' would be roughly as follows:
> > > >
> > > > 1.  Registrars constituency forwards the proposed policy to the NC for
> > > > endorsement.
> > > > 2.  NC posts the proposed policy for public comment and
> > > > specifically seeks a
> > > > response from each of the DNSO constituencies.
> > > > 3.  Comment incorporated into new draft developed by Registrars in
> > liaison
> > > > with NC.
> > > > 4.  New draft published for comment.
> > > > 5.  NC votes on new draft and, if agreed, advises the Board.
> > > > 6.  The BoD considers and votes on the NC advice.
> > > >
> > > > If this is to be incorporated into ICANN policy, there is a
> > > > lengthy process
> > > > to be followed and we need to get to Stage 1 asap.
> > > >
> > > > erica
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Elana Broitman" <ebroitman@register.com>
> > > > To: "Erica Roberts" <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>; "Amadeu
> > Abril i Abril"
> > > > <Amadeu@nominalia.com>; "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > > > Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:03 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
> > Verisign
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > If you will recall, the registrars had agreed to a best practices
> > > > statement,
> > > > > which addresses this issue, among others.  It would help
> > > > further concensus
> > > > > building to consider that draft for a starting position.  Please let
> > me
> > > > know
> > > > > if you need a copy. Thanks, Elana
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: Erica Roberts <erica.roberts@bigpond.com>
> > > > > To: Amadeu Abril i Abril <Amadeu@nominalia.com>; Robert F. Connelly
> > > > > <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > > > > Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 6:32 PM
> > > > > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN
> > > > - Verisign
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > I'm happy to progress this further - and maybe get it
> > > > included in the NC
> > > > > > business plan.
> > > > > > Amadeau - Do you still have the text you drafted when you
> > > > were a member
> > > > of
> > > > > > the NC?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > erica
> > > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > > From: "Amadeu Abril i Abril" <Amadeu@nominalia.com>
> > > > > > To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
> > > > > > Cc: <registrars@dnso.org>
> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:28 AM
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [registrars] DomainRegistry.com response to ICANN -
> > > > Verisign
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Robert F. Connelly" wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > At 09:52 AM 4/2/01 -0400, Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >There are no ICANN policies concerning warehousing.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well, my very last task as NC rep was to start a resolution on
> > > > > > > concrete language to implement the anti-warehousing
> > > > language provided
> > > > > > > for in the ICANN Accreditation Agreement... but was then
> > > > "sent" to the
> > > > > > > Board and I am afraid that NC never pursued that work.....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hope something could be done here ;-))
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Amadeu
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Erlich - DomainRegistry.com, Inc.
215-244-6700 - FAX:215-244-6605 - Reply: erlich@DomainRegistry.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------