RE: [registrars] Minutes & Straw Poll

["Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavint@directi.com>]

I would proposse one more question -

3. Should Registrars accept fax on the Registrants Letterhead as proof of
authorization? Yes__ No__

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of CORE Secretariat (W)
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:54 PM
> To: Michael D. Palage
> Cc: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Minutes & Straw Poll
>
>
> Michael,
>
> I hate to intervene when a poll is launched, but two of the
> questions here
> are unclear.
>
> > 2. Should a standardized transfer authorization template be
> required by all
> > Registrars to verify a transfer request? Yes__ No__
>
> By the gaining registrar or by the losing registrar?
>
> > 3. Should Registrars accept notarized hard copy transfer
> requests as proof
> > of authorization? Yes__ No__
>
> I suspect the objective of the question is to ask if notarised
> hard copies
> should be the standard solution if email verification is not
> possible. Given
> the difficulty in notarising documents in most other countries
> than the US,
> our answer would be NO in that sense. But as the question stands
> now, anyone
> would to answer with YES, in the sense that an existing notarised
> instruction
> should of course be accepted.
>
> Regards,
>
> Werner
>
> --
> CORE Internet Council of Registrars   http://corenic.org
> WTC II, 29 route de Pre-Bois, CH-1215 Geneva, Switzerland
> Tel +4122 929-5744 Fax +4122 929-5745 secretariat@corenic.org
>