ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Tucows Position On Transfer Policies




> commendable.... like i said my only concern is with those gaining
registrars
> who out of neglect or choice do not use a process that lends me comfort.
if
> a process followed by the gaining registrar for gaining express approval
is
> formally defined by the agreement itself, this issue would be resolved.

I'm still not sure that I understand this Bhavin. The current policy
specifically provides recourse to the losing registrar in situations where
you do not feel comfortable with specific transactions.

The downside to what you are proposing is exactly what Bob Connelly brought
up yesterday - registrars employ a broad and varied number of business
models. Logically then, the new policy that standardizes the process you
describe must also be broad and varied. The more complex any solution is,
the more likely we going to introduce new and unanticipated loopholes into
the system. These loopholes are precisely the kind of thing that we must
avoid.

-rwr



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>