Re: [registrars] Would NSI/Verisign indicate auto-nack percentage?

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

Werner,

Here's some stats from our perspective. I would expect that they would be
fairly consistent with the failures rates experienced by other registers.


% of Requests N'ACKed by Losing Registrar*
Q1/2001
Register.com - 38%
Network Solutions/Verisign - 20%

April/May 2001
Register.com - 48%
Network Solutions/Verisign - 28%

June 1 - June 07
Register.com - 90%
Network Solutions/Verisign - 68%

According to SnapNames, in April, Register.com *lost* (on a net basis)
almost 30,000 registrations. If Tucows stats are any indication, their
analysts will be very happy with their May/June numbers.

-rwr


*A rough average for all other registrars is less than 20% n'acked.
----- Original Message -----
From: "CORE Secretariat (W)" <secretariat@corenic.org>
To: <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 7:16 AM
Subject: [registrars] Would NSI/Verisign indicate auto-nack percentage?


> Dear all,
>
> Can NSI/Verising indicate what percentage of transfer requests
> were auto-nacked over the last week?
>
> Regards,
>
> Werner
> --
> CORE Internet Council of Registrars   http://corenic.org
> WTC II, 29 route de Pre-Bois, CH-1215 Geneva, Switzerland
> Tel +4122 929-5744 Fax +4122 929-5745 secretariat@corenic.org