Re: [registrars] NSI/Verisign "failed-to-meet-criteria" justification for nacks

[Patricio Valdes <valdes@parava.net>]

They will allow me to Transfer Out, except now I have to pay them $35 first
before I am able to Transfer because my Domain is in 'Unpaid Status'.

Bhavin Turakhia wrote:

> this i believe should constitute as a violation of the agreement if it is
> true, since a trf should be allowed upto 45 days after expiry.... that is
> the rule
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> > Behalf Of Patricio Valdes
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:04 PM
> > To: tchaffin@stargateinc.com
> > Cc: registrars@dnso.org; CORE Secretariat (W)
> > Subject: Re: [registrars] NSI/Verisign "failed-to-meet-criteria"
> > justification for nacks
> >
> >
> > Tom,
> >
> > I myself am found in the necessity to Renew a personal Domain
> > with NSI because of this. According to the person I spoke to, if
> > you wish to Transfer a Domain out of Network Solutions, it has to
> > be done 30
> > days prior to expiration otherwise it becomes 'Unpaid Status'.
> >
> > Patricio
> > Parava Networks
> >
> > tchaffin wrote:
> >
> > > We have been finding the majority of denials, from
> > NSI/Verisign, we have been receiving, are related to domains
> > being in an "unpaid status" prior to the expiration date.
> > >
> > > We were told NSI's domains go into an "unpaid status" on the
> > due date of the invoice and not the expiration date.  Typically,
> > NSI's due date of the invoice is a few days prior to the exiration date.
> > >
> > > I believe that the losing registrar should state a reason.  We
> > spent hours trying to determine the reason through a series of
> > phone calls with NSI.  Registrants are becoming extremely frustrated.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Tom
> > > Stargate Communications, Inc.
> > >
> > > ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> > > From: "CORE Secretariat (W)" <secretariat@corenic.org>
> > > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:11:49 +0200
> > >
> > > >Dear all,
> > > >
> > > >We are getting a growing number of rejections of transfer requests
> > > >from NSI/Verisign where we are simply told:
> > > >
> > > > "The Change of Registrar request for the domain name,
> > [[[snip]]], has been denied.
> > > >
> > > > This Change of Registrar request was denied because the
> > Domain Name did not meet
> > > > the criteria necessary for Network Solutions/Verisign to
> > permit the transfer."
> > > >
> > > >There is no indication of the criterion which caused the rejection. The
> > > >result is, of course, further aggravation and unnecessary
> > additional workload
> > > >for the customer and the registrar chosen by the customer.
> > > >
> > > >Does the nacking registrar not have the obligation to state
> > the reasons?
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >
> > > >Werner
> > > >--
> > > >CORE Internet Council of Registrars   http://corenic.org
> > > >WTC II, 29 route de Pre-Bois, CH-1215 Geneva, Switzerland
> > > >Tel +4122 929-5744 Fax +4122 929-5745 secretariat@corenic.org
> > > >
> >