[registrars] Fw: Requesting Input from the Constituencies

["Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@digitel.net>]

i would appreciate input here from the registrar constituancy

members

 

regards

 

ken stubbs

----- Original Message -----

From: DannyYounger@cs.com

To: ga@dnso.org

Cc: philip.sheppard@aim.be ; gcarey@carey.cl ; aaus@mpaa.org ; cchicoine@thompsoncoburn.com ; Paul.Kane@reacto.com ; erica.roberts@bigpond.com ; kstubbs@dninet.net ; vany@sdnp.org.pa ; yjpark@myepark.com ; mueller@syracuse.edu ; greg_ruth@yahoo.com ; tony.ar.holmes@bt.com ; harris@cabase.org.ar ; ck@nrm.se ; Richard.Tindal@neulevel.biz ; rcochetti@verisign.com ; grant.forsyth@clear.co.nz ; mcade@att.com ; orobles@nic.mx ; Elisabeth.Porteneuve@cetp.ipsl.fr ; pdeblanc@usvi.net

Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 6:58 AM

Subject: Requesting Input from the Constituencies

Dear Names Council 
representatives, 

The General Assembly is a cross-constituency meeting 
place.  Under discussion 
is an initiative to establish a new 
constituency to properly represent 
individuals.  It would be helpful to 
our discussions if we knew the position 
of each constituency regarding this 
matter.  We ask you to confer with your 
membership and to advise 
accordingly.   

At every plenary session of the Assembly, the 
constituencies are invited to 
speak to the Assembly and to report on issues 
and matters that concern the 
Internet community, the constituency, and the 
DNSO.  Such dialogue should 
occur not only at full sessions of the 
DNSO, but rather as required to deal 
with topics being evaluated. 
 Please consider this to be a formal invitation 
to now address the GA 
with respect to this initiative.   Your input will be 
highly 
valued and appreciated. 

What position does your constituency take with 
regard to the establishment of 
a new constituency to better represent 
individuals?   We look forward to 
hearing your comments.