[registrars] Re: [icann-delete] Let the debates begin

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

;) rick wrote that. Gotta get the quote police in here.

-rwr

----- Original Message -----
From: <dwascher@iaregistry.com>
To: "Registrars Mail List" <registrars@dnso.org>; "Icann-DeleteTotal
Confusion Net" <icann-delete@total.confusion.net>; "Ross Wm Rader"
<ross@tucows.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: [icann-delete] Let the debates begin


> Sorry Ross I was referring to a previous email request
>
> > From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:37 PM
> > To: Rick H Wesson
> > Cc: Rob Hall; icann-delete@total.confusion.net
> > Subject: Re: [icann-delete] Status Update
> >
> >
> >
> > > since we have some non-registrars making proposals that seems fair we
> > > enumerate who speaks for who.  I'd like to see some disclosure of
> > > registrars that partner with proposal submitters. It might be nice to
> > > have all the snapnames partners all stand up.
> >
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-icann-delete@total.confusion.net
> [mailto:owner-icann-delete@total.confusion.net]On Behalf Of Ross Wm
> Rader
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:22 AM
> To: Icann-DeleteTotal Confusion Net
> Subject: Re: [icann-delete] Let the debates begin
>
>
> > Rob,
> > I would like to know of the people / registaras that looking into this
> > process how many are using Snapnames already and or are providing
backend
> > systems for them. I know that Ross had asked the same thing the other
day.
> >
>
>
> Actually, I hadn't asked, but I agreed that those that are, should declare
> themselves. I want to clarify this statement a little bit in case there is
> any misunderstanding.
>
> I am interested in a concise and reasonable debate. Sometimes this is not
> possible when those around the table have not declared their interests. I
> would like those, around this table, to declare their interests. If we are
> creating preference or advantage for an individual or a company through
this
> effort, it is important that we all know about it so that the group can
deal
> with it appropriately through the drafting process.
>
> For instance, imagine that Tucows has a patent on a random selection
process
> that must be used during the drop cycle proposal that Bruce and I tabled.
If
> this isn't declared up-front, then the consideration of the proposal that
> Bruce and I put forward is incomplete and should not be forwarded to VGRS.
>
>
>
> -rwr
>
>