[registrars] .BIZ Litigation

["Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@directi.com>]

possibly repeat questions but important nevrtheless -

1. with the preliminary injunction now there is a higher chance of what was
earlier mentioned - ie being served in california when we attend the icann
meetings..... any comments on that

2. is there an online copy of the complaint filed by the plaintiffs. i had
reviewd a copy earlier and found that the name of our registrar was not on
it ..... however i just recvd a call from some us law firm who states that i
am one of the listed defendants too.....

3. the same lawyer also told me certain possibilities (no percentage chances
but possibilities all the same) -

a) the act of an illegal lottery would be classified as a criminal liability
b) Registrars participating and performing this act would in that sense be
aiding and abetting crime
c) the Neulevel contract does not indemnify the registrar of this even
though the scheme maybe designed by them
d) if the registrars did admit to this liability in this particular case and
it was proved to be a criminal liability a state prosecutor could as well
serve the registrar after this case

4. seems like the answer dates for some of the defendants who have been
served are near and i wanted to know if anyone is doing anything - and what
implications all the abv may have on registrars

Mike: your inputs would be appreciated .....

Best Regards
Bhavin Turakhia
CEO
Directi
----------------------------
Tel: 91-22-6370256 (4 lines)
Fax: 91-22-6370255
http://www.directi.com
----------------------------