<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] Nomination for Ken Stubbs for Names Council
I would like to second Bruce's nomination. Although Ross is an excellent
candidate and has done a tremendous job in connection with the XFER issue, I
am concerned that there will be a lack of continuity on the Names Council if
we have three new representatives. Moreover, Ken over the years has proved a
valuable advocate for the Registrar constituency's best interests.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 5:57 PM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: [registrars] Nomination for Ken Stubbs for Names Council
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to nominate Ken Stubbs for election as a Registrars
> Constituency member on the Names Council. Ken has the benefit of
> experience
> on the Names Council as one of the current members of the Names
> Council, and
> could support new registrar representatives on the Names Council with his
> knowledge of the "history" of previous discussions on the Names Council.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> Melbourne IT
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|