[registrars] RE: CNO Batch Delete Process

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

Rick,

Thank you for sending this request.  We will respond to the Registrars
Constituency as soon as possible and will copy Louis and Dan so that they
can identify any concerns they have early in the process.  But I believe it
would be best to involve other constituencies after VGRS and the registrars
have a chance to work their concerns first.  Starting off with everyone in
the community would probably make the process unwieldy.

My suggestion is that we first try to develop a proposal that VGRS and the
registrars can support including input from ICANN so that their concerns are
addressed.  Then we should quickly involve the gTLD Registry constituency as
a whole because this will probably be an important issue to many other
registries.  Then we can put it forth to all constituencies and the GA.

My intent is definitely not to leave out any interested and/or impacted
party but rather to proceed in a manner that is workable.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 10:19 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: Registrars List; M. Stuart Lynn; Louis Touton; halloran@icann.org;
> rick@ar.com
> Subject: CNO Batch Delete Process
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To VeriSign Global Registration Services:
> 
> As a result of a vote taken by the Registrars' Constituency in in last
> meeting in Marina del Rey, I am authorized by the constituency to ask
> VeriSign to deliver to the Registrars' Constituency and the greater
> Internet stake-holder community a formal and detailed proposal for a
> long-term solution to the issue of deleted domains.
> 
> To date VGRS has advocated a back-ordering solution without clearly
> detailing the costs and policy considerations involved. The Registrar
> Constituency looks forward to working with VGRS and the other
> constituencies in developing a consensus-based solution to 
> this problem.
> Registrars expect that VGRS will fully consider all comments 
> and proposals
> submitted to the discussion lists at 
> icann-delete@total.confusion.net and
> that the proposal will fit within current contracts and 
> agreements with
> the ICANN and Registrars.
> 
> Thanking you in advance for your attention to this matter.
> 
> yours sincerely,
> 
> 
> Rick Wesson
> CTO, Registrars Constituency
> on behalf of the Registrars' Constituency
> 
> 
> 
>