RE: [registrars] ICANN-Verisign contract review

["Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>]

That is why we are posting minutes to these meetings per my previous email
to Bruce earlier today perhaps you missed it. The Ex Com has been very busy
preparing for the elections, preparing ballots, verifying payments, voting
representatives, opening up bank accounts, etc. :-)




> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Elana Broitman
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 10:58 AM
> To: 'williams@lizwilliams.net'; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] ICANN-Verisign contract review
>
>
> Liz brings up an issue that the Ex.Com discussed on Monday, which
> raises the
> question of what other issues were discussed and/or decided?  It would be
> useful for the constituency to know the ex.com's next steps,
> priorities, and
> other decisions, so that we are aware of the direction of the constituency
> and can provide meaniningful input to our representatives.
>
> Regards, Elana
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: williams@lizwilliams.net [mailto:williams@lizwilliams.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:07 PM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: [registrars] ICANN-Verisign contract review
>
>
> All
>
> One thing that was missed in this morning's exchange (yes, it's a
> beautiful
> sunny day here in Australia) was the ICANN Verisign contract review.
>
> The ExCom discussed this issue on Monday and suggested that I work on it.
>
> I'm not sure what the issues are and am more than happy to work on any
> review.  However, I'd need the issues more carefully characterised and
> understand what we expect as outcomes.
>
> If anyone else has further thoughts, let me know.  We can put together a
> small group and see if we can come up with some reasonable solutions.
>
> Kind regards.
>
> Liz
>
> ___________________________________
> NOCC, http://nocc.sourceforge.net
>