ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments


Dear Tony,

Your's was sent to Bruce. ;)

Best
Nikolaj

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antony Van Couvering [mailto:avc@nameengine.com] 
> Sent: 12. december 2001 14:58
> To: Nikolaj Nyholm; Registrars List
> Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments 
> 
> 
> And I was quite surprised to see Nikolaj's note, but no 
> ballot.  Have all the ballots been sent?  It is irregular 
> that some registrars have received ballots while other can 
> only read comments about them. 
> 
> Antony
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nikolaj Nyholm [mailto:nikolajn@ascio.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 AM
> > To: 'Registrars List'
> > Subject: [registrars] by-law ammendments 
> > 
> > 
> > Dear Exec. Committee,
> > 
> > I was quite surprised to receive our ballot this morning - I 
> > do not believe
> > that it has been disclosed that we were voting on anything but NC
> > representatives.
> > I do not believe that there has been a formal process of 
> > placing other votes
> > on the agenda - or am I not following list traffic closely enough?
> > 
> > 
> > I kindly ask the exec. committee to more directly state impacts of
> > ammendments. 
> > For example, it is unclear to me what I am approve or 
> > disapproving in item
> > 4. What is the current practice?
> > 
> > 
> > Thank you in advance.
> > 
> > 
> > Kindest regards
> > Nikolaj Nyholm
> > 
> > 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>