<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments
Dear Tony,
Your's was sent to Bruce. ;)
Best
Nikolaj
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Antony Van Couvering [mailto:avc@nameengine.com]
> Sent: 12. december 2001 14:58
> To: Nikolaj Nyholm; Registrars List
> Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments
>
>
> And I was quite surprised to see Nikolaj's note, but no
> ballot. Have all the ballots been sent? It is irregular
> that some registrars have received ballots while other can
> only read comments about them.
>
> Antony
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nikolaj Nyholm [mailto:nikolajn@ascio.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 AM
> > To: 'Registrars List'
> > Subject: [registrars] by-law ammendments
> >
> >
> > Dear Exec. Committee,
> >
> > I was quite surprised to receive our ballot this morning - I
> > do not believe
> > that it has been disclosed that we were voting on anything but NC
> > representatives.
> > I do not believe that there has been a formal process of
> > placing other votes
> > on the agenda - or am I not following list traffic closely enough?
> >
> >
> > I kindly ask the exec. committee to more directly state impacts of
> > ammendments.
> > For example, it is unclear to me what I am approve or
> > disapproving in item
> > 4. What is the current practice?
> >
> >
> > Thank you in advance.
> >
> >
> > Kindest regards
> > Nikolaj Nyholm
> >
> >
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|