<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments
Antony,
Nameengine is most certainly current, and you should have receieved a
ballot at avc@nameengine.com. We are currently investigating this.
Please let me know if we have an incorrect email address for you.
-Bryan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Antony Van Couvering
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 10:16 AM
> To: Rick Wesson
> Cc: Nikolaj Nyholm; Registrars List
> Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments
>
>
> I think our account is current, but I may be wrong -- and that
> indeed may be the source of the problem. Thanks for looking into it.
>
> Antony
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rick Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:07 AM
> > To: Antony Van Couvering
> > Cc: Nikolaj Nyholm; Registrars List
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments
> >
> >
> >
> > Antony,
> >
> > sorry, i'm still at the ietf, so i'm not more ontop of things.
> > I'll find out about your ballot; it would not have been sent
> > to bruce ;-)
> >
> > balots were only sent to members with current accounts with the
> > constituency, you may want to find your canceled check to
> > icann for your
> > registrar constituency fees, it will help us verify the status of
> > NameEngine.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -rick
> >
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Antony Van Couvering wrote:
> >
> > > Nikolaj,
> > >
> > > If you are correct, then someone has foolishly relied on
> > the telegraphic style of the press to make decisions which
> > actually require finer definitions. VeriSign has agreed to
> > acquire NameEngine, but all the formalities are not yet
> > complete. Furthermore, NameEngine was not given any notice
> > about changes in balloting.
> > >
> > > I await a response from a responsible member of the
> > constituency. If NameEngine's ballot has been sent to Bruce,
> > the vote is improper.
> > >
> > > Antony
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Nikolaj Nyholm [mailto:nikolajn@ascio.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 9:02 AM
> > > > To: Antony Van Couvering; 'Registrars List'
> > > > Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dear Tony,
> > > >
> > > > Your's was sent to Bruce. ;)
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Nikolaj
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Antony Van Couvering [mailto:avc@nameengine.com]
> > > > > Sent: 12. december 2001 14:58
> > > > > To: Nikolaj Nyholm; Registrars List
> > > > > Subject: RE: [registrars] by-law ammendments
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > And I was quite surprised to see Nikolaj's note, but no
> > > > > ballot. Have all the ballots been sent? It is irregular
> > > > > that some registrars have received ballots while other can
> > > > > only read comments about them.
> > > > >
> > > > > Antony
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Nikolaj Nyholm [mailto:nikolajn@ascio.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:41 AM
> > > > > > To: 'Registrars List'
> > > > > > Subject: [registrars] by-law ammendments
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Exec. Committee,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was quite surprised to receive our ballot this morning - I
> > > > > > do not believe
> > > > > > that it has been disclosed that we were voting on
> > anything but NC
> > > > > > representatives.
> > > > > > I do not believe that there has been a formal process of
> > > > > > placing other votes
> > > > > > on the agenda - or am I not following list traffic
> > closely enough?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I kindly ask the exec. committee to more directly
> > state impacts of
> > > > > > ammendments.
> > > > > > For example, it is unclear to me what I am approve or
> > > > > > disapproving in item
> > > > > > 4. What is the current practice?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you in advance.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kindest regards
> > > > > > Nikolaj Nyholm
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|