[registrars] RE: Registrar Wait Listing Proposal

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

Rick,

We are not proposing the Wait Listing Service as a replacement for the
Batch Delete Process.  It would be nice if it could replace that
process, but it is not clear that it could.  We certainly believe that
it should make a positive impact in that regard, but we do not believe
that it will solve all of the deleted names problems. We plan to
continue to explore additional steps that can be taken in this regard
that are not as expensive as the current temporary solution.  But in the
meantime, we will continue the batch delete process.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rick H Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 1:38 PM
> To: Registrars List
> Cc: Gomes, Chuck
> Subject: Registrar Wait Listing Proposal
> 
> 
> 
> Registrars:
> 
> Please review the attached proposal as a replacement for the "overflow
> pools" some times referred to as the "Batch Delete Process."
> 
> Chuck needs comments back to him by the Jan 18th. You may write
> him directly.
> 
> I would also like this constituency to develop a consensus on this
> proposal and that we have a statement to VGRS by Jan 18th. We have
> scheduled a constituency call this month, I will see that 
> this is on the
> agenda for that call.
> 
> regards,
> 
> -rick
> 
> 
>

smime.p7s