RE: [registrars] problems with whois

["Michael D. Palage" <michael@palage.com>]

Will add this to the agenda, however, I believe that this list should be
kept private as opposed to a public document especially if contact
information such as telephone numbers etc. are included.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Bhavin Turakhia
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:07 AM
> To: Registrars@Dnso. Org
> Subject: [registrars] problems with whois
>
>
> I had earlier posted a message to the constituency about how the
> constituency should maintain an updated list of contact information of the
> management or other key people of all registrars. i have several issues i
> want to comunicate to some registrars and i cannot simply find the right
> contact info for them - for instance
>
> * several registrars sometimes NACK a transfer - i dont know whom
> to contact
> for an explanation
>
> * several registrars have non functional port 43 WHOIS .... i again dont
> know whom to contact to get it fixed since all transfers from
> taht registrar
> get stcuk as our scripts cannot access that registrars whois
>
> * whenever we ACK / NACK a transfer request we are supposed to
> send an email
> to the gaining registrar ..... I dont know where to send it to.
>
> Michael can we put this tiny thing as one of the things we need to get
> done - ie get an updated contact information list of EVERY operational
> registrar (not just constituency members), and post it up on the
> constituency website.
>
> If any assistance is required from my side I will be more than happy - put
> up a form to collect this etc etc
>
> Best Regards
> Bhavin Turakhia
> CEO
> Directi
> ----------------------------
> Tel: 91-22-6370256 (4 lines)
> Fax: 91-22-6370255
> http://www.directi.com
> ----------------------------
>