<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [registrars] problems with whois
I'd be much more prone to keep this information updated, rather than some
document within the constituency.
/n
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bhavin Turakhia [mailto:bhavin.t@directi.com]
> Sent: 14. januar 2002 09:22
> To: 'Registrars@Dnso. Org'
> Subject: RE: [registrars] problems with whois
>
>
> missed that :) ...... however how many registrars are keeping
> that up2date?
> also since that is public information i wonder how many
> registrars have
> management level contacts there .... ie contacts that other
> registrars may
> typically need.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nikolaj Nyholm [mailto:nikolajn@ascio.com]
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:42 PM
> > To: 'Bhavin Turakhia'; 'Registrars@Dnso. Org'
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] problems with whois
> >
> >
> > Bhavin,
> >
> > Why not just use the registry whois - it has contact (admin,
> > tech, billing)
> > information for all registrars.
> >
> >
> http://www.internic.net/cgi/whois?whois_nic=eNom%2C+Inc.&type=
registrar
>
> /n
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bhavin Turakhia [mailto:bhavin.t@directi.com]
> > Sent: 14. januar 2002 06:52
> > To: Registrars@Dnso. Org
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] problems with whois
> >
> >
> > > Will add this to the agenda, however, I believe that this
> > list should be
> > > kept private as opposed to a public document especially if contact
> > > information such as telephone numbers etc. are included.
> >
> > agreed ..... maybe a private registrars only area on the constituency
> > website ...... where we can have a searchable db for contact
> > info of other
> > registrars...
> >
> > if need be i can get the programming done (in PHP -
> > MySQL)...... (and host
> > it if need be too) .....
> >
> > bhavin
> >
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|