[registrars] RE: [icann-delete] WLS Input - Greatest Good vs. Benefits of the Few

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@verisign.com>]

Ross,

Nothing has changed with the statements I made. On what basis did you
conclude that we would "arbitrarily launch the service without
appropriately consulting the community?"

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:33 PM
> To: Ron Wiener; ga@dnso.org; icann-delete@total.confusion.net
> Cc: Registrars@Dnso. Org
> Subject: Re: [icann-delete] WLS Input - Greatest Good vs. Benefits of
> the Few
> 
> 
> Ron,
> 
> I haven't yet had a time to digest the entire PDF, so these 
> comments are
> limited to a specific portion of the document. Further 
> comments on the rest
> of the document later.
> 
> (text deleted)
> 
> I do have one question for VGRS and SnapNames however based 
> on a couple of
> statements made by Chuck last October concerning
> 
> "ICANN would certainly need to be involved if any changes 
> were required to
> existing agreements or existing policy."
> 
> and
> 
> "In response to Ross' question about where we go from here, I 
> stated that I
> am still willing to work with ICANN with regard to policy 
> issues and within
> VGRS to develop estimated time frames for the possible 
> implementation of the
> [WLS] proposal."
> 
> When do you expect that this will finally happen? My 
> preference is that it
> occur before you arbitrarily launch the service without appropriately
> consulting the community. Perhaps this is a self-interested 
> minority view as
> well however, so I might be off-base wth this one.
> 
> -rwr
> 
>>

smime.p7s