RE: [registrars] Expired names

["David Wascher" <dwascher@iaregistry.com>]

Thanks, Chuck.
Bruce can you shed some lite on this. If you need some domain names I can
provide this also. Also can you look into why domains that have nameservers
attached appear not to delete at all.

Thanks,
David

-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes Chuck [mailto:cgomes@verisign.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:37 AM
To: 'Jim Archer'; Registrars Mail List
Cc: dwascher@iaregistry.com; Gomes Chuck
Subject: RE: [registrars] Expired names


Jim/David,

There has been absolutely no change in the way VGRS is processing batch
deletes, nor do we have any intention of making any changes in the future,
regardless of what happens with regard to the WLS proposal.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Archer [mailto:jarcher@RegistrationTek.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 6:20 PM
> To: Registrars Mail List
> Cc: dwascher@iaregistry.com; cgomes@verisign.com
> Subject: Re: [registrars] Expired names
>
>
> This is a very good question.  Chuck, can you shed some light
> on what's
> going on here?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> --On Wednesday, February 06, 2002 4:39 PM -0500
> dwascher@iaregistry.com
> wrote:
>
> > Why are the expired names being held up while the WLS is
> being drafted.
> >
> > It has been an entire month since the last drop (January) and the
> > connections to VGRS have gotten worse to say the least for normal
> > business.
> >
> > It appears that this is a way to hold domains to improve
> gross profits
> > when the WLS goes into effect. Why can't the names continue to be
> > released for the next month or so until we are forced to
> use WLS which is
> > inevitably going to happen.
> >
> > David
>
>
>
> ************************************
> James W. Archer
> Registration Technologies, Inc.
> 10 Crestview Drive
> Greenville, RI 02828
> 401-949-4768 (voice)
> 401-949-5814 (fax)
> jarcher@RegistrationTek.com
>