Re: [registrars] Current status of namescouncil views on ICANN reform

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

Bruce - should I take this to mean that the current RC task force has been
disbanded?

I've been following the NC discussions, but it appears that the RC level
discussions haven't necessarily followed suit to the same degree of
seriousness.

Thanks,

-rwr
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>
To: "Registrars@Dnso. Org" <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:48 PM
Subject: [registrars] Current status of namescouncil views on ICANN reform


> Hello All,
>
> Please review:
> http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020424.Response-Reform-v6.html
>
> It contains the current status of discussions on the ICANN reform within
the
> names council.
>
> The next namescouncil conference call is on Wed 24 April.
>
> I would appreciate any comments on the list.
>
> It looks like it will be difficult to come up with a coordinated
registrars
> position by the end of April, although there have been a few conference
> calls amongst registrars to discuss, as well as discussions amongst those
> that attended in Ghana.  Most of us are busy trying to run a business :-)
>
> I recommend that individual registrars make their own coherent submission
to
> ICANN, and provide a copy of their submission to the registrars list.  I
> intend to do this.  I have found it very useful to hear the views of
others
> which will help form my own submission.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin