RE: [registrars] Afilias Response to Bhavins earlier Posting

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>]

Even so Bhavin, I agree with Bob. Our customers don't always have all of
their facts straight when they contact us with a problem, but if we
insulted them for it, whether it's public or private, I don't think we'd be
in business long.

Tim

-------- Original Message --------
   Subject: RE: [registrars] Afilias Response to Bhavin's earlier Posting
   From: "Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@directi.com>
   Date: Fri, May 31, 2002 10:45 pm
   To: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>

   Hi,

   I agree with Afilias ...... I should have verified the facts b4
   probably putting up the research. It was meant to be simply
   statistical in nature, but I did not mean any harm. There is however
   an inaccuracies section that I put up below on the same page, where I
   mentioned tht the following types of domains in the list would be
   inaccurate

   * those challenged by another challenger

   * those that were challenged were actually genuine names and the
   respondent had the necessary trademark

   * some names that were challenged were not released in LR2 because
   they were put on ICANN Reserver (like country names etc)

   In all fairness however I am posting the Afilias response to this on
   the same website in order for everyone to get the fair picture ......

   Sorry for any blooper ... dint mean any harm - simply meant to bring
   certain facts to notice....

   incidentally would that mean that a certain number of names which are
   still in the challenge process will be released live?? if so would
   this be random??

   bhavin

   > -----Original Message-----
   > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
   > Behalf Of Robert F. Connelly
   > Sent: Saturday, June 01, 2002 4:34 AM
   > To: Registrar Constituency
   > Cc: Hal Lubsen
   > Subject: Re: [registrars] Afilias Response to Bhavin's earlier
   > Posting
   >
   >
   > At 05:29 PM 5/31/02 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
   >
   > >We suggest to Mr. Turakhia that, should he have any additional
   > questions or
   > >comments in the future, it would be beneficial to the greater
   > community to
   > >verify the facts before making public comments.
   >
   > It looked to me as through Bhavin put a lot of effort into his
   > study.  Since he did not look at the shadow database (was it open to
   > him?),
   > he made some mistakes.
   >
   > I don't think he deserves to be insulted for his diligent efforts.
   >
   > Regards, BobC