[registrars] RE: Votebot

[Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@melbourneit.com.au>]

> 
> Mike - I'd like to propose an alternate approach (slightly modified).
> The recommendations contain many nuances that need be considered.
> Throwing out the alternate recommendations because of legal concerns
> surrounding point II.F would be highly inappropriate.
> 
> My suggestion would be to use the votebot to allow members to vote on
> all of the points I.A-C, II.A-E and cast an abstention on II.F by
> default (no vote, no discussion as a matter of constituency "policy").
> This would allow our NC reps to see exactly where the points of
> agreement/disagreement are and vote/negotiate/discuss 
> accordingly during
> the call. It would also be wise to include a Votebot option on the
> entire report as well (excluding II.F) in order to simplify 
> the analysis
> for our NC reps.
> 

The approach Ross suggests above would be most helpful to the Task Force
reps as well as the Names Council reps.  We can provide targetted feedback.
For example some points might get more than 80% support, while others may be
around the 60% mark.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin