ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[registrars] comments on transfer task force WLS report (was: WLS - VOTING - Objection)



Specific comments:


 a) With VGRS' statement of "no favored treatment of Snap Names 
    holders", the most important barrier was removed from the WLS.

 b) As Michael 
    (http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/msg02713.html), 
    we don't support that "The WLS include a requirement that notice 
    be provided by the Registry (through the registrar) to the 
    existing registrant of a domain name when a WLS option is taken 
    out against that registrant's domain name." (Section II, D).

 c) We do, however, support that "The WLS include a requirement 
    for full transparency as to who has placed a WLS option on a 
    domain name and the registrar that actions the option." (Section 
    II, E).


Regards,
Nikolaj



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com] 
> Sent: 22. juli 2002 14:52
> To: 'Nikolaj Nyholm'; registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection
> 
> 
> Tim/Nikolaj,
> 
> Do either of you have any specific comments on any of the specific
> recommendations in the final report? It would be especially helpful if
> you could provide me with any thoughts you might have in that regard.
> 
> 
> 
>                        -rwr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
> idiot."
> - Steven Wright
> 
> Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
> http://www.byte.org/heathrow
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> > [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Nikolaj Nyholm
> > Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:08 AM
> > To: 'registrars@dnso.org'
> > Subject: RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection
> > 
> > 
> > > So, at this time we DO NOT
> > > oppose the WLS
> > > and DO oppose the TF recommendations as a whole. We would 
> > support the
> > > recommendation regarding the Redemptions Grace Period if it 
> > > were separate
> > > from the rest of the report.
> > 
> > Ascio shares this position.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Nikolaj
> > 
> 


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>