RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@godaddy.com>]

> as for privacy, its illusion, is the only thing vanising.

Sad, but true. I choose not to hasten it.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Wesson [mailto:wessorh@ar.com]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:22 AM
To: Tim Ruiz
Cc: registrars@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [registrars] WLS - VOTING - Objection


On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Tim Ruiz wrote:

> And I'm not suggesting that the personal information of the WLS holder not
> be gathered. Just that it not be publicly available. VeriSign or ICANN can
> use it to evaluate the WLS success, or lack of it, or whatever. I would
just
> hate to see a repeat of the privacy fiasco that the port 43 Whois program
> has become.


look, we don't know what will happen... what we do know is that there will
be confusion and my customers that own IPR require that they know when
somone has a claim on their property, and the can identify the entity
involved, if the information is not public we have larger problems.

as for privacy, its illusion, is the only thing vanising.

-rick