Re: [registrars] WLS - VOTING

["Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>]

At 09:34 PM 7/21/02 -0400, Michael D. Palage wrote:
>PROPOSED BALLOT:
>
>With regard to the Names Council Task Force report on the WLS,
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020714.TFtransfer-WLS-report.html, and the
>"Preferred Recommendations" That (1) The ICANN board move with all haste to
>implement and actively enforce the proposed Redemptions Grace Period for
>Deleted Names policy and practice; and (2) The ICANN Board reject Verisign's
>request to amend its agreement to enable it to introduce its proposed WLS;
>and (3) The ICANN Board reject Verisign's request to trial the WLS for 12
>months.
>
>[x ] I oppose it
>[ ] I support it
>
>
>With regard to the Names Council Task Force report on the WLS,
>http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020714.TFtransfer-WLS-report.html, and the
>"Alternative Recommendations" regarding pricing, notification, accessibility
>of whois information, etc. (see Alternate Recommendations for all 6
>recommendations).
>
>[x ] I oppose it
>[ ] I support it