[registrars] FW: [nc-transfer] NC Transfer Task Force - Outline of Voting

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>]

It appears that the entire document will be dealt with on a very
granular level this afternoon - which means that the document is still
open for discussion, negotiation and amendment. I will file a report
concerning the call as soon as it is over this afternoon.



                       -rwr




"There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
idiot."
- Steven Wright

Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
http://www.byte.org/heathrow
 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nc-transfer@dnso.org [mailto:owner-nc-transfer@dnso.org] On
Behalf Of DNSO Secretariat
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 1:15 PM
To: nc-transfer@dnso.org
Subject: [nc-transfer] NC Transfer Task Force - Outline of Voting 


DOCUMENT FOR TRANSFER TASK FORCE TELECONFERENCE
Monday 22 July 2002 14:00, (2:00 pm) EST

OUTLINE OF VOTING PLAN  BASED ON TF RECOMMENDATIONS

TR-TR Preferred Recommendation:
I. Recommendation to deny the WLS:

A. The ICANN board move with all haste to implement and actively enforce
the proposed Redemptions Grace Period for Deleted Names policy and
practice Yes No Abstain

B. The ICANN Board reject Verisign's request to amend its agreement to
enable it to introduce its proposed WLS. Yes No Abstain


C. The ICANN Board reject Verisign's request to trial the WLS for 12
months. Yes No Abstain

I. Recommendation to deny the WLS:
Yes
No
Abstain


II. Should the ICANN board not accept the policy recommendations noted
above and grant Verisign's request for a change to its agreement and a
12 month trial of its WLS, we would alternatively recommend that WLS be
approved with
conditions:

A. The introduction of WLS is dependent on the implementation and proven
(for not less than three months) practice envisaged in the proposed
Redemption Grace Period for Deleted Names policy and practice and the
establishment of a standard deletion period. Yes No Abstain

B. The TF recommends that any interim Grace Period have all the
characteristics and conditions of the Redemption Grace Period now in
implementation. Yes No Abstain

C. Several Constituencies remain concerned that a standard deletion
period be established and implemented. Some TF members believe that this
could be considered separately from WLS.

1) Standard Deletions should be established at same time as WLS and
implemented before WLS. Yes No Abstain

2) Standard deletions should be established, but need not be in place
before WLS is implemented. Yes No Abstain

3) Standard deletions should be considered separately.
Yes
NO
Abstain

D. The WLS include a requirement that notice be provided by the Registry
(through the registrar) to the existing registrant of a domain name when
a WLS option is taken out against that registrant's domain name.
{Notice} Yes No Abstain

E. The WLS include a requirement for full transparency as to who has
placed a WLS option on a domain name and the registrar that actions the
option. {Transparency} Yes No Abstain

F. Based on the above two points (notice and transparency), the price
for the WLS be set at the same amount as the current registry fee for a
registration - the cost of the WLS function being no more, an probably
less, than a registration - plus any additional costs to "notice and
transparency', based on Verisign's provision of such validating
information on such costs to the Board/Staff.

Yes
No
Abstain