ICANN/DNSO
DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[registrars] PERSONAL APPEAL !


FELLOW REGISTRARS...

right now i (and the other names council reps) are in need of  "MORE
SPECIFIC INPUT"  from the constituancy... specifically a response to michael
palages voting proposals

WE NEED YES AND NO'S ... (not more discussion at this time.)

we have well over 50 members of the constituancy and yet, to date i have
postings here from less than 10 members..

at this point in time, the issues are becoming so clouded by some of these
"recent posts-to-date"  that, frankly,  i would be inclined to abstain as i
am having trouble finding an concensus fro the constituancy on the TF
proposal i & the other names council reps have to vote on this wednesday...

 there have been significant changes and addendums made over the last 4
months but VERY LITTLE RESPONSE OR REACTION  from the overwhelming majority
of the registrars..

if those registrars who were not present &  voted in bucharest (or
subsequently , expressed their opinions "post bucharest")   aren't
interested in "going on the record" or letting your constituancy reps know
your position, then you put us in a tenous position..

those of you whom i am addressing in this post...........

cant you please take  5 minutes & send a short e-mail to bruce, philip
grabensee, or myself and let us know what your current "position" is on
these proposals ?

PROPOSED BALLOT:

With regard to the Names Council Task Force report on the WLS,
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020714.TFtransfer-WLS-report.html, and the
"Preferred Recommendations" That (1) The ICANN board move with all haste to
implement and actively enforce the proposed Redemptions Grace Period for
Deleted Names policy and practice; and (2) The ICANN Board reject Verisign's
request to amend its agreement to enable it to introduce its proposed WLS;
and (3) The ICANN Board reject Verisign's request to trial the WLS for 12
months.
[ ] I oppose it
[ ] I support it

With regard to the Names Council Task Force report on the WLS,
http://www.dnso.org/dnso/notes/20020714.TFtransfer-WLS-report.html, and the
"Alternative Recommendations" regarding pricing, notification, accessibility
of whois information, etc. (see Alternate Recommendations for all 6
recommendations).
[ ] I oppose it
[ ] I support it


please help us out here ...

ken stubbs



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>