RE: [registrars] WLS - We don;t have this much input

["Patricio Valdes" <valdes@parava.net>]

Jim,

Exactly. I cannot agree with you more.

All the comments going back and forth are in regards to modifications to the
WLS.

It should be either YES or NO! Period!

We say NO WLS!

Patricio Valdes
Parava Networks

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Jim Archer
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 4:27 PM
To: registrars@dnso.org
Subject: [registrars] WLS - We don;t have this much input


I don't see why everyone is making suggestions about how a WLS should work.
Verisign put out a proposal, and we should be responding exactly to what
they proposed, not some yet to be decided service that they may or may not
choose to implement.

My expectation is that if Verisign gets any approval on WLS they will
implement it as they want, which, quite frankly, is understandable.

Most important, I think that the RC and the entire NC should deal with the
proposal on the table, and thats it.

Once again, I urge everyone to oppose it.

Jim

******************************
Jim Archer
CEO
http://www.registrationtek.com