DNSO Archives: [registrars]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] Code of conduct & anti-trust issues

To: Registrar Constituency <registrars@dnso.org>
Subject: Re: [registrars] Code of conduct & anti-trust issues
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:42:22 -0700
In-Reply-To: <22928940.1030463872@MACDUFF>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0208202141140.21736-100000@flash.ar.com><Pine.LNX.4.33.0208202141140.21736-100000@flash.ar.com>
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org

At 03:57 PM 8/27/02 -0400, Jim Archer wrote:
>to what extent if any, the CoC constitutes an anti-competitive business 
>practice?

Dear Jim:  If we used it to cut off a registrar, it would be a 
problem:-(  Regards, BobC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [registrars] Code of conduct & anti-trust issues
  - From: Michael Bilow <mbilow@registrationtek.com>

References:
- [registrars] code of conduct
  - From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
- [registrars] code of conduct
  - From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
- [registrars] Code of conduct & anti-trust issues
  - From: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>