Re: [registrars] FYI: Revision 8 of TF recs.

["Joyce Lin" <joyce@007names.com>]

Ross,

What is the concern that a losing registrar can not deny a transfer because
the domain name is not paid up?

Joyce


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@tucows.com>
To: <registrars@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:13 PM
Subject: [registrars] FYI: Revision 8 of TF recs.


> Please find a copy of the latest Transfers TF discussion doc attached.
>
>
>
>                        -rwr
>
>
>
>
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
> idiot."
> - Steven Wright
>
> Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
>
> Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal:
> http://www.byte.org/heathrow
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Wm. Rader [mailto:ross@tucows.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 6:12 PM
> To: 'nc-transfer@dnso.org'
> Subject: Revision 8 of TF recs.
>
>
> Folks,
>
> Please find attached the latest draft (revision 8) of the TF
> recommendations.
>
> I have done a lot more tidying up this week and have merged the other
> documents back into the base as per our discussion on the conference
> call last week. I have also included a merged version of the
> registry/registrar proposals that were floated last week. Jeff and I
> haven't compared notes yet despite best intentions, but I believe that
> we are close enough to intent at this point to "let loose the language".
> There are still a few niggly bits left with Appendix A that Mark and Ram
> will be picking up on this week - I would consider us extremely close at
> this point.
>
> As always, drop me a note if there are any questions.
>
>                        -rwr
>
> (PS - My continuing apologies for the proprietary document format).
>
>
> "There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an
> idiot."
> - Steven Wright
>
> Got Blog? http://www.byte.org/blog
>
> Please review our ICANN Reform Proposal: http://www.byte.org/heathrow
>
>
>
>