RE: [registrars] Shanghai Agenda

[Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>]

Bruce,

could you dig a little deeper into those two topics for the folks that
did not attend the FTC meeting or Amsterdam? Whic aspects do you want
discussed, do you advocate a piticular position with either topic?

thanks,

-rick

On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Beckwith, Bruce wrote:

> Mike,
>
> Would you also please consider devoting some time during the Registrar
> Constituency meeting to the following two topics, which were discussed some
> at the FTC meeting, as well as touched on during the Amsterdam meeting:
>
> - Bulk WhoIs Requirement
> - Port 43 Access
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bruce
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael D. Palage [mailto:michael@palage.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:29 AM
> To: registrars@dnso.org
> Subject: [registrars] Shanghai Agenda
>
>
> Hello All:
>
> I should have the agenda for Shanghai's meeting finalized by Monday after
> the next Registrar Constituency Executive Call. Current topics on the
> agenda: ICANN reform; update on transfers and Whois Task Forces; initiation
> of deletes task force; .org transition; and whois update (CRISP/Universal
> Whois). An additional topic that I believe is worth wild to add in new TLDs.
> Bret Fausett has recently published an article on principle' concerning the
> new TLD process, see http://www.lextext.com/newTLDdiscussionpaper.html. I
> believe that it is a document that many should read as I believe it is worth
> the constituency backing it. If there are any other topic anyone would like
> added to the agenda, please let me know.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael D. Palage
>