DNSO Archives: [registrars]

ICANN/DNSO DNSO Mailling lists archives

[registrars]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [registrars] ORG Redelegation

To: Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
Subject: Re: [registrars] ORG Redelegation
From: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 16:40:42 -0500
cc: Patrick <dnso-reg@gandi.net>, Registrars@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211151156260.1044-100000@flash.ar.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0211151156260.1044-100000@flash.ar.com>
Reply-To: Jim Archer <jarcher@registrationtek.com>
Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org



--On Friday, November 15, 2002 12:00 PM -0800 Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com> 
wrote:

> only recently have registrars noted that thick registries are actually a
> threat to their own business model.

Not true.  We creamed about it as soon as we found out about it.  No one 
listened.

References:
- Re: [registrars] ORG Redelegation
  - From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>
- Re: [registrars] ORG Redelegation
  - From: Rick Wesson <wessorh@ar.com>

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>