RE: [registrars] Draft Ballot Language

["Bhavin Turakhia" <bhavin.t@directi.com>]

Shouldn't there be an official ballot on Chucks proposal too?? That way
there will be no ambiguity on how much support, each of the proposals
have

bhavin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org 
> [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org] On Behalf Of Rick Wesson
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 6:50 AM
> To: Registrars List
> Cc: Registrars Executive Committee
> Subject: [registrars] Draft Ballot Language 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Registrars:
> 
> below are two ballots which I will create on our on-line 
> voting system. If you have any issues with the language or 
> intent please post your concern ASAP.
> 
> If I don't hear an objection I will have the ballots created 
> within a few hours from now (5:20pm PDT)
> 
> -rick
> 
>  WHOIS
> 
>  [ ] I support the WHOIS Task Force report in whole;
>  [ ] I recommend that the WHOIS Task Force wait until the 
> next meeting to
>      propose its recommendations in order provide adequate time for
>      consultation with registrars in order to conduct an 
> assessment of the
>      potential costs and impact on competition caused by the 
> recommendations
>      in the report.
>  [ ] I cannot support the principles contained within the Task Force
>      report.
> 
>  TRANSFERS
> 
>  [ ] I support the Transfer's Task Force report in whole;
>  [ ] I support most of the principles contained within the 
> Transfer's Task
>      Force, however there remain certain implementation 
> issues that should
>      be addressed by a registrar/registry implementation 
> committee.  [ ] I cannot support the principles contained 
> within the Task Force
>      report.
> 
> 
> 
>