RE: [registrars] Whois and Transfers Ballot Results

["Rob Hall" <rob@momentous.com>]

Just on a note of procedure, are we sure, in general, that we want to post
the DETAILS of any vote to this list ?

How we voted in detail by company is available to all of us through the
boardrooms site.  The interface is quite good actually.  But do we need to
make every vote cast more public ?

And I do not mean to imply that this specific vote should not be made
public, rather it is a question to procedure as to what we should do for all
votes taken.

Rob.

P.S.  Mike:  If you had voted, which Registrar would you have been
representing ?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Registrars List
Subject: RE: [registrars] Whois and Transfers Ballot Results


Rick:

Could you please post the full results, i.e. what companies voted for what
positions. This will be valuable to help our Names Council representatives
as they are currently confronted with various worded positions.

Best Regards,

Mike

P.S. Sorry for not voting in time, however, if I did it would have voted for
option #2 in both ballots.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-registrars@dnso.org [mailto:owner-registrars@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Rick Wesson
> Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 2:46 AM
> To: Registrars List
> Cc: Registrars Executive Committee
> Subject: [registrars] Whois and Transfers Ballot Results
>
>
>
> Registrars:
>
> A asterisk (*) denotes the option carried by popular vote. For complete
> results, such as whom voted for what please see the Ballot Details page
> at https://www.boardrooms.org/apps/org/workgroup/registrars/ballots.php
>
>
>   WHOIS
>
>   [ ] I support the WHOIS Task Force report in whole;
> 	Voters: 6	% of Total: 38
>
>   [*] I recommend that the WHOIS Task Force wait until the next meeting to
>       propose its recommendations in order provide adequate time for
>       consultation with registrars in order to conduct an
> assessment of the
>       potential costs and impact on competition caused by the
> recommendations
>       in the report.
> 	Voters: 10	% of Total: 63
>
>   [ ] I cannot support the principles contained within the Task Force
>       report.
> 	Voters: 0	% of Total: 0
>
> RC Members eligible to vote on this ballot that did not cast a vote:
>
>   Mike Palage
>   Scott Hemphill
>   Paul Stahura
>   Nikolaj Nyholm
>   Patrick Mevzek
>   Clint Page
>   Thomas Moerz
>   Bruno Piarulli
>   Christophe Wolfhugel
>   Dierstein Mathieu
>   Ross Rader
>   Bruce Tonkin
>   Gretchen Olive
>
>
>
>   TRANSFERS
>
>   [*] I support the Transfer's Task Force report in whole;
> 	Voters: 12 	% of Total: 57%
>
>   [ ] I support most of the principles contained within the
> Transfer's Task
>       Force, however there remain certain implementation issues
> that should
>       be addressed by a registrar/registry implementation committee.
> 	Voters: 7 	% of Total: 33
>
>   [ ] I cannot support the principles contained within the Task Force
>       report.
>  	Voters: 2	% of Total: 10
>
> RC Members eligible to vote on this ballot that did not cast a vote:
>
>   Mike Palage
>   Christopher Kruk
>   Scott Hemphill
>   Patrick Mevzek
>   Clint Page
>   Bruno Piarulli
>   Christophe Wolfhugel
>   Dierstein Mathieu
>   Gretchen Olive
>
>
>