<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[registrars] Why I don't think Elana should be on the transfer implementation task force
- To: Registrar Constituency <registrars@dnso.org>
- Subject: [registrars] Why I don't think Elana should be on the transfer implementation task force
- From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:26:37 -0800
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0212271215350.42311-100000@java2.dpcsys.com>
- Sender: owner-registrars@dnso.org
At 12:20 PM 12/27/02 -0800, Tech Support wrote:
>The email address for the admin contact of xxxxxxx.com
>is still working. The person who uses that address is a friend
>of mine. He says he never received anything from register.com
>about a transfer earlier this month, and has not received anything
>recently re. the second transfer I put through on 12/23
>
>I think ICANN needs to get involved. It looks like register.com
>is just blowing transfer requests off.
Dear Colleagues: You see why I don't think Elana should be on that task
force!-(
Regards, BobC
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"There's small choice between rotten applies!"
U.B. Bray
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|